Study of MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) With or Without Tremelimumab Versus Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Urothelial Cancer
NCT02516241Phase 3Active, not recruiting
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca (Industry)
- Enrollment
- 1,126 (actual)
- Start date
- 2 Nov 2015
- Primary completion
- 27 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026
- Last update posted
- 14 Jul 2026
Design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention model
- Parallel
- Masking
- None
- Arms
- 3
Interventions
- MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) Drug
- Tremelimumab Drug
- Cisplatin Drug
- Carboplatin Drug
- Gemcitabine Drug
Conditions and primary outcome
- Urothelial Cancer
Primary outcome
To Assess the Efficacy of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC in Terms of OS in Full Analysis Set (From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).); To Assess the Efficacy of Durvalumab Monotherapy Versus SoC in Terms of OS in PD-L1-High Analysis Set (From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).)
Posted results on ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov results for NCT02516241 (opens in a new tab)· Licence: public-domain
First posted · Last update posted · Imported from ClinicalTrials.gov download 2026-10-25
Primary outcomes with a statistical analysis
To Assess the Efficacy of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC in Terms of OS in Full Analysis Set
- Time frame
- From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).
- Measure
- Median
- Unit
- Months
Combination Therapy vs Standard of CareSuperiority
- Estimate
- 0.85Hazard Ratio (HR)
- 98.66% CI, two-sided
- 0.688 to 1.063
- p-value
- 0.0751
- Method
- Log Rank
To Assess the Efficacy of Durvalumab Monotherapy Versus SoC in Terms of OS in PD-L1-High Analysis Set
- Time frame
- From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).
- Measure
- Median
- Unit
- Months
Monotherapy vs Standard of CareSuperiority
- Estimate
- 0.89Hazard Ratio (HR)
- 96.99% CI, two-sided
- 0.695 to 1.139
- p-value
- 0.3039
- Method
- Log Rank
Serious adverse events
Time frame: From first administration of study treatment up to 90 days after last dose of study medication or date of initiation of the first subsequent therapy, whichever occurs first, approximately 5 years. All-cause mortality, from screening up to data cut-off date (27JAN2020, approximately 5 years).
| Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | 179 | 340 |
| Monotherapy | 139 | 345 |
| Standard of Care | 125 | 313 |
Posted results as ClinicalTrials.gov prints them: primary outcome analyses and serious adverse event totals only. Registry facts, not reviewed by HealthTrade and not investment advice; filing-derived results are listed separately.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Listing a study does not mean NLM has evaluated it.
Results from company and journal sources
No editor-confirmed results are on record for this study.
Publications
1 on PubMedDurvalumab alone and durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (DANUBE): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.
The Lancet. Oncology · 2020 Dec
PubMed 32971005 (opens in a new tab)DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30541-6 (opens in a new tab)
Citations from PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine; abstracts are not stored. A publication lists this study’s NCT number and may be a review that cites many studies.
CT-VCA trial quality
About CT-VCALoading CT-VCA scores…
Data integrity
Compare what the registry, company releases, FDA documents and publications say about this study.
Drugs on HealthTrade
Source
- NCT02516241 on ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab) Licence: public-domain. Read
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Listing a study does not mean NLM has evaluated it.
Nothing on this page is medical or investment advice.