A Study of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Patients With HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Received Two or More Prior HER2 Directed Regimens in the Metastatic Setting
NCT01808573 · NALA Phase 3Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (Industry)
- Enrollment
- 621 (actual)
- Start date
- 29 Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- 28 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Dec 2019
- Last update posted
- 11 Jun 2021
Design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention model
- Parallel
- Masking
- None
- Arms
- 2
Interventions
- neratinib Drug
- capecitabine Drug
- lapatinib Drug
Conditions and primary outcome
- HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)
Primary outcome
Centrally Assessed Progression Free Survival (From randomization date to recurrence, progression or death, assessed up to 38 months. The result is based on primary analysis data cut.); Overall Survival (From randomization date to death, assessed up to 59 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.)
Posted results on ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov results for NCT01808573 (opens in a new tab)· Licence: public-domain
First posted · Last update posted · Imported from ClinicalTrials.gov download 2026-10-25
Primary outcomes with a statistical analysis
Centrally Assessed Progression Free Survival
- Time frame
- From randomization date to recurrence, progression or death, assessed up to 38 months. The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
- Measure
- Mean
- Unit
- months
Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus CapecitabineSuperiority
- Estimate
- 0.762Hazard Ratio (HR)
- 95% CI, two-sided
- 0.626 to 0.926
- p-value
- 0.0059
- Method
- Log Rank
Overall Survival
- Time frame
- From randomization date to death, assessed up to 59 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
- Measure
- Mean
- Unit
- months
Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus CapecitabineSuperiority
- Estimate
- 0.881Hazard Ratio (HR)
- 95% CI, two-sided
- 0.723 to 1.073
- p-value
- 0.2086
- Method
- Log Rank
Serious adverse events
Time frame: From time of first dose, through 28 days after last dose, assessed up to 41 months.
| Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|
| Neratinib Plus Capecitabine | 103 | 303 |
| Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine | 93 | 311 |
Posted results as ClinicalTrials.gov prints them: primary outcome analyses and serious adverse event totals only. Registry facts, not reviewed by HealthTrade and not investment advice; filing-derived results are listed separately.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Listing a study does not mean NLM has evaluated it.
Results from company and journal sources
No editor-confirmed results are on record for this study.
Publications
2 on PubMedAnalysis of the pan-Asian subgroup of patients in the NALA Trial: a randomized phase III NALA Trial comparing neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in patients with HER2+metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with two or more HER2-directed regimens.
Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021 Oct
PubMed 34553296 (opens in a new tab)DOI 10.1007/s10549-021-06313-5 (opens in a new tab)
Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With ≥ 2 HER2-Directed Regimens: Phase III NALA Trial.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020 Sep 20
PubMed 32678716 (opens in a new tab)DOI 10.1200/JCO.20.00147 (opens in a new tab)
Citations from PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine; abstracts are not stored. A publication lists this study’s NCT number and may be a review that cites many studies.
CT-VCA trial quality
About CT-VCALoading CT-VCA scores…
Data integrity
Compare what the registry, company releases, FDA documents and publications say about this study.
Drugs on HealthTrade
Source
- NCT01808573 on ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab) Licence: public-domain. Read
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Listing a study does not mean NLM has evaluated it.
Nothing on this page is medical or investment advice.